Using Argument Mapping to Improve Critical Thinking Skills

نویسنده

  • Tim van Gelder
چکیده

The centrality of critical thinking (CT) as a goal of higher education is uncontroversial. In a recent high-profile book, Academically Adrift , Arum and Roksa report that “99 percent of college faculty say that developing students’ ability to think critically is a ‘very important’ or ‘essential’ goal of undergraduate education” (2011, 35), citing (HERI 2009). However a major message of their work is that college education generally makes little progress toward this goal: “Many students are only minimally improving their skills in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writing during their journeys through higher education” (35). Indeed for many students college education appears to be failing completely in this regard: “With a large sample of more than 2,300 students, we observe no statistically significant gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writing skills for at least 45 percent of the students in our study” (36). Their message is barely more positive than H. L. Mencken’s acerbic comment, over a century ago: “Certainly everyday observation shows that the average college course produces no visible augmentation in the intellectual equipment and capacity of the student. Not long ago, in fact, an actual demonstration in Pennsylvania demonstrated that students often regress so much during their four years that the average senior is less intelligent, by all known tests, than the average freshman” (Mencken 1997, 98). Yet we also know that college education can positively impact CT; simply put, CT can be taught. In a meta-analysis of 117 studies of college-level efforts to teach critical thinking, Abrami et al. found “a generally positive effect of instruction on students’ CT skills” (2008, 1119). However the amount of gain found in these studies varied widely, and Abrami et al. concluded that it makes quite a difference how CT is taught. They say “both the type of CT intervention and the pedagogical grounding of the 11 Using Argument Mapping to Improve Critical Thinking Skills

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

No Computer Program Required: Even Pencil-and-Paper Argument Mapping Improves Critical Thinking Skills

Argument mapping software abounds, 1 and one of the reasons is that using the software has been shown to teach/promote/improve critical thinking skills. These positive results are very encouraging, but they also raise the question of whether the computer tutorial environment is producing these results, or whether learning argument mapping, even with just paper and pencil, is sufficient. Based o...

متن کامل

Compression the Effect of Clinical Concept Mapping & Nursing Process in Developing Nursing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills

Introduction: Development of critical thinking and clinical education has remained a serious and considerable challenge throughout the nursing educational system in Iran. Education experts believe that effective teaching methods such as concept mapping and nursing process are practical strategies for critical development. Thus, this study was carried out to compare the effectiveness of clinical...

متن کامل

The Effect of Concept Mapping on Nursing Students' Critical Thinking Skills and Nursing Care Plan Design

Introduction: The concept mapping method has been used in nursing education for many years; However, limited studies have examined its effect on critical thinking skills and nursing care program design. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of concept mapping method on critical thinking skills and nursing care program in nursing students. Methods: This two- group educational trial...

متن کامل

The education effect based on concept mapping on critical thinking skills of midwifery students

Background and objective: Enhancing critical thinking is a challenge faced in Medical profession. Evaluation of data and choosing proper intervention to reach a correct decision needs skillful thinking. . Midwife as a clinical decision maker uses critical thinking in providing proficient care. Present studies is aimed at determining the education effect based on concept mapping on critical thin...

متن کامل

Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking

Computer-based argument mapping greatly enhances student critical thinking, more than tripling absolute gains made by other methods. I describe the method and my experience as an outsider. Argument mapping often showed precisely how students were erring (for example: confusing helping premises for separate reasons), making it much easier for them to fix their errors. I’ve been skeptical about c...

متن کامل

مقایسه‌ی تاثیر آموزش درس اصول و فنون پرستاری به روش نقشه مفهومی و روش متداول بر مهارت‌های تفکر انتقادی دانشجویان پرستاری

Background and Objective: Development of critical thinking and practical skills has remained a serious and considerable challenge throughout the nursing educational system in Iran. Conventional methods of teaching such as lectures as the dominant method used in higher education system is a passive style which ignores critical thinking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015